Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. Moyle
Utah Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceLarson, Chief Justice
I concur in the order made, but I reach my conclusions by a less circuitous route. I think some of the bases upon which the prevailing opinion rests are rather unstable. I do not subscribe to the reasoning of the prevailing opinion as to the legal fiction which it assumes as a basis for its conclusions. The fiction set up by the old English common law of a lost grant as a ground for prescriptive rights, being without basis in fact and without necessity in law, should be utterly disregarded. It is as unreal and unsubstantial as the “will-o-the wisp”, — an ignis fatuus. It is merely a legal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morris v. BluntUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- Harkness v. WoodmanseeUtah Supreme Court · 1891
- Bolton v. MurphyUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- Farr v. Wheelwright Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917
- Yeager v. WoodruffUtah Supreme Court · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.