Legal Opinion

Jilin Bright Future Chem. Co., Ltd. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 21, 2023No. 21-00336Published

1Opinion of the Court

Slip Op. 23-188 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE JILIN BRIGHT FUTURE CHEMICALS CO., LTD., Plaintiff, NINGXIA GUANGHUA CHERISHMET ACTIVATED CARBON CO., LTD. AND DATONG MUNICIPAL YUNGUANG ACTIVATED CARBON CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Intervenors, Before: Mark A. Barnett, Chief Judge v. Court No. 22-00336 UNITED STATES, Defendant, and CALGON CARBON CORPORATION AND NORIT AMERICAS, INC., Defendant-Intervenors. OPINION [Denying Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the agency record and sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce’s final results in the fourteenth administrative review of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Novosteel Sa v. United States, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation and U.S. Steel Group, a Unit of Usx Corporation (Now Known as United States Steel Llc)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  4. NMB Singapore Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  5. Downhole Pipe & Equipment, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API