Legal Opinion
Wilensky v. Martin
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 9, 1908No. 977PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Certiorari, from Chatham superior court — Judge Cann. November 23, 1907.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
The plaintiff placed his horse in the pasture of the defendants as agistors. The horse was blind, and fell into an uncovered well in the defendants’ pasture and was killed. A suit *188was brought to recover the value of the horse, which the agistors refused to pay, relying upon the fact that they informed the agent of the owner of the horse, when they received the animal, that there were at least a dozen places in the pasture where a blind horse might be killed. The jury returned a verdict for the defendants. Exception is taken to the order of the judge of the superior court overruling the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morris Storage & Transfer Co. v. WilkesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Arrington Bros. & Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Haines v. ChappellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Calland v. NicholsNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Rey v. ToneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Howkins v. Atlanta Baggage & Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Richter Bros. v. Atlantic Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Boles v. Hartsfield Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Shaw v. Allen & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Fulton v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912