Legal Opinion

Gray v. South Carolina Public Service Authority

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 1, 1985No. 22232PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

This is an equitable action by the appellants Gray and Finney for repurchase of land condemned by the respondent Public Service Authority (PSA) in 1941. The trial court entered judgment for the respondent. We affirm.

In an equitable action tried by the trial judge without a reference, this Court can find the facts in accordance with its view of the evidence and correct errors of law. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of Greenville, 266 S. C. 81, 221 S. E. (2d) 773 (1976); Indigo Realty Co., Ltd. v. City of Charleston, 281 S. C. 234, 314 S. E. (2d) 601 (1984).

In 1910, Abe Levi…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. GREGG v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  3. Burnett v. Holliday Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  4. HEMINGWAY v. MentionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  5. Cain v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lollis v. LollisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Gibbs v. KimbrellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Smothers v. Richland Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Pinckney v. City of BeaufortCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  5. Timms v. TimmsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API