Legal Opinion
United States v. John Reginald Rohrbach
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 5, 1987No. 86-1724PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.
John Reginald Rohrbach appeals from his criminal conviction, contending that the District Court erred by denying his motion to suppress oral statements made by him to special agents of the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF). The statements in question were admitted into evidence at Rohrbach’s trial, and he was convicted under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(a)(6) and 924(a) on two counts of making a false statement with respect to a fact material to the lawfulness of the sale of a firearm. For reversal, he argues that the statements should have been suppressed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Connecticut v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Eugene R. Frazier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. Edward E. Bordeaux, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Robert L. Derrick v. R.S. Peterson, Superintendent, Oregon State Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Robert T. Sidebottom v. Paul Delo Jay NixonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Frank Andrew McCall v. Michael Dutton and W.J. Michael CodyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Charles PalmerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.