Fairley v. Department of Labor & Industries
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
The Department of Labor and Industries (Department) appeals a summary judgment requiring a claim made by Carolyn Fairley for compensation under the crime victims compensation act, RCW 7.68 (Act) to be reevaluated. We affirm.
Three questions are presented: (1) Did the trial court have jurisdiction to determine the validity of Mrs. Fairley's claim when she failed to appeal the Department's decision within 60 days as required by RCW 51.52.060? (2) Does a Supreme Court decision, rendered after the Department determination but before appeal to the superior court, control? and (3) Does a subsequent…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Johnson v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Haddenham v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Anderson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- Cowiche Growers, Inc. v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- State ex rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Marine Power & Equipment Co. v. Human Rights Commission Hearing TribunalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Solven v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Birrueta v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.