Birrueta v. Department of Labor & Industries
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSiddoway, C.J.
¶1 The superior court in this case held that the Department of Labor and Industries was without authority to assess Jose Birrueta for an overpayment of time-loss benefits and to change his marital status for compensation purposes under RCW 51.32.240. This was because Mr. Birrueta’s marital status had been determined in a 2008 notice of decision by the department that had become final under RCW 51.52.050. In so holding, the trial court implicitly rejected at least two decisions by the Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals that construed the current version of RCW 51.32.240 as providing…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. TriWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Kingery v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Kingery v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Birrueta v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Michael L. Sims v. Dept Of Labor & Industries Of The State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Birrueta v. Dep't of Labor & Indus.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
- Birrueta v. Dep't of Labor & Indus.Washington Supreme Court · 2016