Lee W. Rand, Jeremy D. Boyce, Keisha M. Guichard, and Edmond J. Harris v. City of New Orleans
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtKnoll, J.
|, This direct appeal was lodged in this Court concerning the constitutional sufficiency of the administrative adjudication procedure which the City of New Orleans has established for its citizens who challenge tickets that were issued automatically on the basis of photographic evidence obtained from traffic cameras.
In 2007, the City of New Orleans (the “City”) enacted a group of ordinances, codified as Sections 154-1701 through 15-1704 of its Code of Ordinances, which created the Automated Traffic Enforcement System (“ATES”). In 2011, plaintiffs filed a “Petition for Preliminary and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boudreaux v. STATE, DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- Mary Moe, LLC v. Louisiana Bd. of EthicsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Rand v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Rand v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tsegaye v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Rapalo-Alfaro v. LeeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Lee Rand v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
- La. Dep't. of Health & Hosps. v. BernardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Lee Rand v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.