Kramer v. Boeing Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DIRECTING ENFORCEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FINDING PLAINTIFFS’ COUNSEL IN CONTEMPT
DEVITT, District Judge.
Introduction
This now settled diversity action arising out of a fire aboard a Boeing 737 aircraft is before the court upon various motions brought by both parties. Defendant Pratt & Whitney moves to enforce the settlement agreement and hold plaintiffs’ attorney David F. Fitzgerald in criminal and civil contempt for refusal to return defendant’s discovery documents as required by the protective orders and settlement agreement. Plaintiffs make six motions in sup*257port of their…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aubrey Hendrix v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Donald R. Huene and Annette S. Huene v. United States of America and Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Morris G. WORTHY, Appellant, v. McKesson CORPORATION D/B/A Peter Hauptmann Company, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Kramer v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Koch Refining Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chill v. Green Tree Financial Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Coleman v. American Red CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Miller Brewing Co. v. Meal Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1998
- Coleman v. American Red CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.