Legal Opinion

Faulconer v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 16, 1997No. 95-10169; CA A93542PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.

This case concerns the existence of a 20-foot easement for roadway purposes across the north portion of plaintiffs’ property. Plaintiffs brought an action to quiet title, claiming that the easement in question had been extinguished due to adverse possession by plaintiffs and their predecessors in interest. Alternatively, plaintiffs argued that the easement had been extinguished due to abandonment. The trial court rejected each of plaintiffs’ claims. On appeal, plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in determining that their possession of the easement was not “hostile,” in determining…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lee v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Patterson v. Chambers Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Smith v. TippettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Abbott v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Slak v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Faulconer v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mid-Valley Resources, Inc. v. Foxglove Properties, LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API