Legal Opinion

Means v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 10, 1973No. 1 CA-1C 781PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Judge.

The petitioner, Ruth Means, requests that this Court set aside an award of The Industrial Commission of Arizona, which award denied the reinstatement of her widow’s compensation after her second marriage had been annulled by a decree of the Superior Court.

Prior to and during the month of April 1965 the petitioner and Lyle Lloyd Means were husband and wife. During the existence of the marital relationship, Mr. *485Means died as the result of an industrial accident. Under Claim No. TC-271 the petitioner received an Industrial Commission award of a monthly allowance pursuant to A.R.S.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Hallford v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. State Compensation Fund v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. State Compensation Fund v. FoughtyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Means v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Means v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API