Legal Opinion
Means v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 24, 1973No. 11242-PRPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Vice Chief Justice.
This is a petition for review of a decision and opinion of the Court of Appeals, 19 Ariz.App. 484, 508 P.2d 371 (1973), which affirmed an award of the Industrial Commission of Arizona denying compensation to the petitioner Ruth Means.
We consider only one question and that is: May an annulment be obtained on grounds which constitute an impediment rendering the marriage void or voidable if the same grounds are available by statute as the basis for obtaining a divorce ?
The facts necessary for a determination of this matter on appeal are as follows. Prior to April 1965…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Black v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Hallford v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Harper v. DupreeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- State Compensation Fund v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hodges v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- State ex rel. Department of Economic Security v. DemetzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- People v. Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Margaret A. Hopkins v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.