Means v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
110 Ariz. 72 (1973)
515 P.2d 29
Ruth MEANS, Petitioner,
v.
The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, Phelps Dodge Corporation, Respondent Employer, State Compensation Fund, Respondent Carrier.
No. 11242-PR.
Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc.
October 24, 1973.
Rehearing Denied November 27, 1973.
Whitehill, Berger & Karp, P.C., by David D. West, Tucson, for petitioner.
William C. Wahl, Jr., Chief Counsel The Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.
Evans, Kitchel & Jenckes, P.C., by Stephen W. Pogson and Richard L. Levin, Phoenix, for respondent employer.
Robert K. Park, Chief…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Black v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Hallford v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Means v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Harper v. DupreeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.