Legal Opinion

Mulvaney v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 7, 1993No. C7-93-934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Gregory T. Mulvaney appeals from the district court order that sustained the revocation of his driving privilege, contending he was denied his right to consult with an attorney before making a decision concerning chemical testing.

FACTS

On July 31, 1992, appellant Gregory T. Mulvaney was arrested for driving while under the influence. Appellant testified that on the way to the police department the arresting officer asked him if he was going to cooperate. Appellant told him he would be willing to take the test if his lawyer so advised. At the station, the officer read…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Kuhn v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Eveslage v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Clough v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ruffenach v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  2. Haveri v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  3. Linde v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  4. McNaughton v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. State v. ChristiansenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API