Legal Opinion
State v. Christiansen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 19, 1994No. C2-93-1490PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Chief Judge.
Appellant Todd Christiansen was arrested for driving while under the influence. The arresting officer read him the implied consent advisory and Christiansen agreed to take a blood alcohol concentration test. Christiansen later moved to suppress the results of the test on the ground that his right to counsel was violated. The trial court denied Christiansen’s motion. Christiansen then waived a jury trial and agreed to proceed pursuant to State v. Lothenbach, 296 N.W.2d 854, 858 (Minn.1980). Christiansen was convicted of violating Minn.Stat. § 169.-121, subd. 1(e)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. StorvickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Kuhn v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mayo v. MooreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- McNaughton v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. SletteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- STATE, CITY OF BELLE PLAINE v. StradcutterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Peter Alan Krech v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.