Kulling v. Grinders for Industry, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING VARIOUS POST-TRIAL MOTIONS
ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Laverne Kulling, Richard A. Beal, and William A. Scheib brought suit in this Court on September 3,-1999, alleging that Plaintiffs Beal and Scheib and Plaintiff Kulling’s late husband, Carl G. Kulling, were unlawfully discharged from their employment with Defendant Toyoda Machinery U.S.A. Corporation (“Toyoda”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Defendant Grinders For Industry, Inc. (“GFI”), in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. 1 This case…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Officer Melissa Kallstrom v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Debra Black v. Zaring Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dolgencorp, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017
- Sherman v. KasotakisDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004
- Adell v. John Richards Homes Building Co. (In Re John Richards Homes Building Co.)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Kesterson v. Kent State Univ.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2018
- Seay v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.