In Re Kansas City Star Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
The United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri held that the Missouri Sunshine Law does not prevent the Kansas City, Missouri School District Board of Directors from appearing before the district court’s Desegregation Monitoring Committee in closed session. Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus instructing the district court to hold its order in abeyance. We deny the writ of mandamus, but remand the case for farther tailoring of the district court’s order in consideration of ideals of comity and the underlying concerns of state law.
BACKGROUND
In 1986,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Cooper v. AaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Holly W. BAUMAN Et Al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent, Union Oil Company, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- National Ass'n of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Inc. v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Clay Regional Water v. City of Spirit Lake, IowaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2002
- SNL Securities, L.C. v. National Ass'n of Insurance CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re: Arlene Otis, Arlene Otis v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Natl Assn Cr Def Law v. DOJCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.