Legal Opinion

Baker v. North Carolina Department of Correction

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 21, 1987No. 8610IC920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

The one question presented on this appeal is whether the Commission erred in concluding that Willingham “was not negligent in his closing of the window of the sick room.”

The law imposes upon every person who enters upon an active cause of conduct the positive duty to exercise ordinary care to protect others from harm and a violation of such duty constitutes negligence. Williamson v. Clay, 243 N.C. 337, 90 S.E. 2d 727 (1956); Abner Corp. v. City Roofing & Sheetmetal Co., 73 N.C. App. 470, 326 S.E. 2d 632 (1985).

The Commission in the present case made the finding that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abner Corp. v. City Roofing and Sheetmetal Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Williamson v. ClaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Richardson v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Jones v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Nicholson v. American Safety Utility Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Richardson v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Richardson v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API