Legal Opinion

Tiger International, Inc. And the Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 18, 1977No. 75-1774PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

This appeal comes to us in the form of a petition to review certain orders of the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB). 49 U.S.C. § 1486. The petitioners, Tiger International, Inc. (TI) 1 and The Flying Tiger Line Inc. (FTL), argue that the CAB had no jurisdiction to issue Order 70-6-119 and that it acted beyond its authority, in an arbitrary and capricious manner, without a basis in substantial evidence, and in violation of due process in issuing Order 73-12-106 and Order 75-2-1. Because we find that we have no jurisdiction to review Order 70-6-119, we dismiss the petition as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Sheldon v. SillSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  5. Schacht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Ashley Hunt Greenwood v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. City of Rochester v. BondCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  3. Reid v. EngenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Kolek v. EngenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Suburban O'Hare Commission v. Elizabeth Hanford Dole, Secretary of the Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API