Legal Opinion

Petersen v. City of Clemson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 13, 1993No. 2104PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

John E. Petersen and others (collectively referred to as “Petersen”) brought an action against the City of Clemson < and others (collectively referred to as “the City”) seeking a declaratory judgment that the City of Clemson’s zoning ordinance adopted March 4, 1991 is invalid, and that the rezoning of a thirty-five acre tract of land adjacent to their properties (the Kinsler property) from residential to Planned Development Mixed-Use (PD) is invalid. Petersen alleged the City rezoned the Kinsler property in an arbitrary and capricious manner without proper notice and without a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. HarperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
  2. Bob Jones University, Inc. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  3. Rushing v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  4. Town of Scranton v. WilloughbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Hampton v. Richland CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harkins v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Peterson Outdoor Advertising v. City of Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Newton v. Zoning Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership v. Mount Pleasant, Town ofDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API