Petersen v. City of Clemson
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Cureton, Judge:
John E. Petersen and others (collectively referred to as “Petersen”) brought an action against the City of Clemson < and others (collectively referred to as “the City”) seeking a declaratory judgment that the City of Clemson’s zoning ordinance adopted March 4, 1991 is invalid, and that the rezoning of a thirty-five acre tract of land adjacent to their properties (the Kinsler property) from residential to Planned Development Mixed-Use (PD) is invalid. Petersen alleged the City rezoned the Kinsler property in an arbitrary and capricious manner without proper notice and without a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. HarperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
- Bob Jones University, Inc. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
- Rushing v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Town of Scranton v. WilloughbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Hampton v. Richland CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harkins v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Peterson Outdoor Advertising v. City of Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Newton v. Zoning Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership v. Mount Pleasant, Town ofDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023