Legal Opinion

Town of Scranton v. Willoughby

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 16, 1991No. 23542PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from an action seeking a mandatory injunction requiring removal of a mobile home from an area not zoned for mobile home use. We reverse and remand.

The Town of Scranton enacted a comprehensive zoning ordinance, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the community. As a part of the Town’s zoning ordinance, all mobile homes are required to be placed in a designated mobile home district. Respondent, Amar Willoughby, set up his mobile home in an area not zoned for mobile home use, after which the Town sought the mandatory injunction. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rush v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  2. Town of Hilton Head Island v. Fine Liquors, Ltd.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  3. Bob Jones University, Inc. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  4. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dunes West Golf Club, LLC v. Town of Mount PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  2. Bibco Corp. v. City of SumterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Eagle Container Co. Ex Rel. Estate of Spotts v. County of NewberryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Peoples Program for Endangered Species v. SextonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Bear Enterprises v. County of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API