Legal Opinion

Gold v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1989No. S008838PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

We review the recommendation of the Review Department of the State Bar Court (hereinafter review department) that petitioner Donald J. Gold be suspended from the practice of law for three years, but that the order of suspension be stayed, and that he be placed on probation for three years subject to certain conditions, including an actual suspension of ninety days.

Gold contends that the 90-day actual suspension recommended by the review department is too harsh and that the hearing referee’s recommendation of no actual suspension is more appropriate. After considering the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Chefsky v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bernstein v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Smith v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Garlow v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conroy v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Bledsoe v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Gold v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API