State v. Nelson
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Polk District Court. The defendant was indicted for, tried and convicted of, the crime of nuisance, committed by using a building for the purpose of keeping and selling therein intoxicating liquors contrary to law. The defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
*2091. INTOXICATING liquors: juror : challenge for cause. *208I. The jury being filled for the trial of the cause with the exception of one man, and the defendant having exhausted his peremptory challenges, H. Monroe was called by *209the sheriff, and, upon examination answered as follows: “I have no opinion in the case; 1 would try my best to do justice to a man on trial for an offense of this ° kind. Almost every one knows that I am opposed to the business of saloon keeping. I am opposed to the law regulating the sale of intoxicating liquors, but as long as it stands as it now is, I am not prejudiced…
2Cited by10 opinions
- People v. . Van GaasbeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- State v. BarrettaUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. PiazzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- People v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- State v. KeenanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.