Hoffman v. Bank of Minot
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Cass County; Rose and Lauder, J’s. Action by E. V. Hoffman against the Bank of Minot. From an order appointing a receiver, from an order refusing to discharge the receiver, and from an order overruling a previous order dismissing the original action, defendant prosecutes three separate appeals, which are consolidated, and disposed of in one opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBartholomew, J.
There are three cases, eo nomine, but they are so interwoven and interdependent that it will be more satisfactory to dispose of them all in one opinion. They all arise out of efforts made by the defendant and appellant to discharge a receiver appointed in the original action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant.
*474We are first' confronted with a motion made on behalf of the receiver to be permitted to appear in this court and resist the appeals. This receiver was appointed soon after the institution of the action. The action was brought by plaintiff in her own name, and, so far as the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Opening of Gold Street v. NewtonSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1878
- Crook v. FindleyNew York Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by9 opinions
- Baird v. LeforNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- State ex rel. Sparks v. State Bank & Trust Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1913
- State ex rel. Miller v. People's State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Tesorero de Puerto Rico v. Banco Comercial de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1933
- State ex rel. Mears v. BarnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.