Crook v. Findley
New York Supreme Court
Motion to restrain a receiver appointed by the marine court from selling cartain market stands, upon the ground, among others, that the judgment in the action in which the receiver had been appointed in supplementary proceedings had been satisfied.
1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.
The payment of the amount imposed upon Winters as judgment debtor, for his disobedience of the order of the marine court and his interference with the property *376included in the receivership, does not, of course, entitle himself or the defendant Findley to a stay of the receiver’s proceedings. For he shows that he has claims for expenses incurred in the exercise of his authority which may still be required to be paid before the debtor, or the property claimed to be owned by him, can be taken out of the receiver’s possession. Whether all the lawful demands which he may be warranted in asserting…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Fountain v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Hoffman v. Bank of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Steinert v. Van AkenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914