Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hinrichs v. Lockwood

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 20, 1923No. 23,531PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

In the divorce action of Adele I). Hinrichs against H. A. Hin-richs, relator herein, pending in the district court of Hennepin county, plaintiff duly recovered on October 2, 1922, a judgment annulling the marriage between the parties, with an allowance of alimony and suit money in the following language:

“It is further adjudged and decreed that defendant pay to plaintiff as permanent alimony, the sum of forty dollars per month on or before the 10th day of each month, * * * commencing November 1st, 1922. That defendant pay to plaintiff the sum of seventy five dollars as and for an allowance for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re SnellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. State ex rel. Kelly v. WolferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. State ex rel. Hurd v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. State ex rel. Carmody v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. State ex rel. Moriarity v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. FoleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Plankers v. PlankersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Hanson v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State Ex Rel. Smith v. LeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API