Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Todnem

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 14, 2018No. A16-0698PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKeig, Justice.

Appellant Birch Hansen ("Hansen") and respondent Suzanne Todnem ("Todnem") established a parenting plan for their son, K.T., on July 24, 2015. On August 3, 2015, Hansen moved in the Ramsey County District Court for additional parenting time to provide before- and after-school child care for K.T. while Todnem was working. The district court denied Hansen's request on the ground that it was not in K.T.'s best interests. Hansen appealed, arguing that the district court failed to make detailed and specific findings on each of the factors listed in Minn. Stat. § 518.17, subd. 1(a)…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Marriage of Goldman v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. Green Giant Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. State on Behalf of Gunderson v. PreussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Morey v. PeppinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the Marriage of: Sarah Nicole Smith v. Jonathan George SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026
  2. Joseph Deidrick v. Clarissa DozierCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API