Perry v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Chief Judge.
Appellant-petitioner Rodney S. Perry appeals the denial of his post-conviction relief. He argues that the post-conviction court committed judicial misconduct and erroneously concluded that he did not receive the ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. Finding no error, we affirm.
FACTS
The underlying facts were summarized in Perry's direct appeal as follows:
On January 6, 1997, Perry broke into the house of his estranged wife, Mar-sheila Perry, after his mother-in-law, Florida Clark, refused to let him in. Marsheila struck Perry with a baseball bat, but…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bieghler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Serino v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Segura v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Cotto v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Benefield v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Tharpe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Vazquez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Alexa R. Hamilton v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
- Anthony Eshelman v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.