Legal Opinion

Jilin Bright Future Chems. Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 3, 2023No. 22-00336Published

1Opinion of the Court

Slip Op. 23-28 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE JILIN BRIGHT FUTURE CHEMICALS CO. LTD, Plaintiff, and NINGXIA GUANGHUA CHERISHMET ACTIVATED CARBON CO., LTD. AND DATONG MUNICIPAL YUNGUANG ACTIVATED CARBON CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Intervenors, Before: Mark A. Barnett, Chief Judge Court No. 22-00336 v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and CALGON CARBON CORPORATION AND NORIT AMERICAS, INC., Defendant-Intervenors. OPINION AND ORDER [Granting Plaintiff-Intervenors’ motion for preliminary injunction to enjoin the United States from liquidating certain of Plaintiff-Intervenors’ entries of activated…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Vinson v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Qingdao Taifa Group Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  5. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API