Legal Opinion

(PS) Singh v. USCIS

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 6, 2020No. 2:18-cv-02929Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VEER B SINGH, No. 2:18-cv-2929 JAM DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 USCIS, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, 15 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff Veer Singh is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, 19 referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 On June 17, 2019, the undersigned took under submission defendant’s motion to dismiss or for a 21 more definitive statement. (ECF No. 16.) For the reasons stated below,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API