Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific R. R. Co. v. Qualls

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 17, 1925No. 15328PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, inverse to their order here. Qualls had judgment against the railroad company for $500 for damages to his automobile, incurred at the railroad crossing and based on the negligence of defendant. Plaintiff alleged that) the accident “almost completely demolished it.” He did not in fact repair this car, but introduced evidence tending to show what the cost of new parts would be and the cost of labor for such repairs, and also the usable value pending the repair. The witness, by whom plaintiff provea the cost of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marland Refining Co. v. DuffySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Weleetka Light & Water Co. v. NorthropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Kincaid v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Mitchell v. WadsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Coe v. EsauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  2. Delmar B. Dennis v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  3. Chambers v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Oklahoma City v. WilcoxsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Concho Const. Co., Inc. Concho Const. Co., Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API