Legal Opinion

Oklahoma City v. Wilcoxson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 10, 1935No. 24049PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiff, Wilcoxson, sued defendant, city of Oklahoma City, for damages growing out of a collision with au automobile being operated by an employee of the defendant. The action was for $2,000 on account of personal injuries ,and for $250, on account of damages to plaintiff’s automobile. These items of damage were set forth as separate causes of action in plaintiff’s petition.

The basis of plaintiff’s claim, as set forth In Lis petition, was: (1) That the defendant, at the time of the collision, was operating defendant’s car…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Producing & Refining Corp. of America v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. HolidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Marland Refining Co. v. DuffySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Missouri Pacific R. R. Co. v. QuallsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Galveston-Houston Electric Ry. Co. v. EnglishCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pilgeram v. HassMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Brennen v. AstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. Midland Valley Railroad Co. v. PettieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Scritchfield v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  5. Bryan v. HoughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API