City of Tacoma v. Perkins
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
The problem presented is this: Does certain money belong to the local improvement guaranty bond fund of the city of Tacoma, or should it be distributed between that fund and the city, as statutory trustee of local improvement district No. 347?
The facts are not in dispute.' Local improvement district No. 347 was established by ordinánce of the city of Tacoma in 1910. The improvements were made; assessments were levied against the property in the district; bonds were issued, to mature in 1920. A portion of the local improver ment district assessments became delinquent. Petitioners are now the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Tacoma v. Fletcher Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
- Moe v. BrumfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- State Ex Rel. King County Water District v. StacyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Thestrup v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Clise v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fidelity Mutual Savings Bank v. MarkWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Summerhill Village Homeowners Ass'n v. RoughleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Palzar v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Fidelity Mutual Savings Bank v. MarkWashington Supreme Court · 1989