Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Seedorf Masonry, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1997No. S-96-1112PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Antonio Acosta appeals the decision of the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court review panel which affirmed the compensation court’s determination that since Acosta is not yet participating in an approved plan, the court is not authorized to order payment of temporary total disability.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-185 (Reissue 1993), an appellate court may modify, reverse, or set aside a Workers’ Compensation Court decision only when (1) the compensation court acted without or in excess of its powers; (2) the judgment, order, or award was procured by fraud; (3)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cords v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Kerkman v. Weidner Williams Roofing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Wilson v. LARKINS & SONS & SONSNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Baltensperger v. United States Department of AgricultureNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Kirkland v. AbramsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Community First State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Owen v. American Hydraulics, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hobza v. Seedorff Masonry, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Roth v. Sarpy County Highway DepartmentNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Varela v. Fisher Roofing Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API