Legal Opinion

Fulenwider v. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 30, 1930No. 6 Div. 596PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The bill was by the executors and trustees for the removal of the administration and construction of the will.

The respective pleadings sought and consented for the removal of the administration of said estate from the probate court to the circuit court in equity, and sought construction of the will of decedent to enable the executors and trustees to properly proceed with the administration and execution of the trust created.

Leslie Fulenwider and his infant son, Howard, were the sole beneficiaries of said will. The former was the only brother, and the latter the nephew, of decedent. The trial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ralls v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Fowlkes v. ClaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Vandiver & Co. v. PollakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  4. Powell v. LabrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Colbert v. DanielSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garrett v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. In Re Cloninger's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Sheehy v. O'DonoghueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API