Legal Opinion
Powell v. Labry
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 18, 1923No. 6 Div. 900PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The general rules of equity pleading are well stated by this court, and need not be repeated. Heflin v. Heflin, 208 Ala. 69; Overton v. Moseley, 135 Ala. 599, 33 South. 696; Cockrell v. Gurley, 26 Ala. 405. The bill as amended conformed thereto and was filed after the expiration of the time for presentation of claims against the estate: no error was committed in ruling on demurrer.
In Powell v. Labry, 207 Ala. 117, 92 South. 266, the bill as amended was held sufficient for removal of the administration into equity under General Acts 1915, p. 738; and it was there held that the construction of…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Waring v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Winsett v. WinsettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Ralls v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Penney v. Pritchard & McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Jennings v. JenningsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Austin v. PeppermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Joseph H. Proctor, as Administrator, C/t/a of the Estate of Pinkie Sutton, Deceased v. J. C. GissendanerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Foster v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.