Legal Opinion

Hollywood Leasing Corp. v. Rosenblum

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided July 9, 1979PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Norman H. Shilling, J.

In this holdover summary proceeding, landlord petitioner maintains that tenant respondents, by keeping a dog in their residential apartment, are committing a substantial breach of their lease which contains a provision prohibiting the harboring of animals on the premises without written consent of the landlord. The lease in question, a standard residential form lease, also contains a clause prohibiting waiver by the landlord of any provision therein, as well as a clause providing that no oral representations have been made by landlord or its agents,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Park West Management Corp. v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. In re Estate of FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Industralease Automated & Scientific Equipment Corp. v. R. M. E. Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. Seabrook v. Commuter Housing Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Knudsen v. LaxWatertown City Court · 2007
  2. Hollywood Leasing Corp. v. RosenblumAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API