Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees Union, Local No. 320 v. County of Washington
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MULALLY, Judge.
This appeal from summary judgment challenges the trial court’s determination that, as a matter of law, the topic of health insurance benefits for retired public employees is excluded from the scope of collective bargaining under the Minnesota Public Employment Labor Relations Act (PELRA). We affirm.
*246FACTS
Appellant Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees Union, Local No. 320 (Union) is the exclusive representative for essential employees and probation officers employed by respondent County of Washington (County). For several years in the past, the County…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Incorporated Village of Lynbrook v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. SundquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- City of Mason City v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
3Cited by8 opinions
- Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Chisholm v. NormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. County of MowerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. County of MowerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Chisholm v. NormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. County of MowerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.