Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. County of Mower
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
In its collective bargaining agreement with essential employees, represented by appellant Law Enforcement Labor Services (LELS), respondent Mower County promised retiree health insurance benefits. LELS contends the trial court erred in its determination that respondent may unilaterally change these contract terms once impasse on the subject is reached during contract negotiations.
Respondents, the county and its commissioners, seek review of the trial court’s further determination that under the collective bargaining contract at issue the rights to full payment of health…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Christensen v. Minneapolis Municipal Employees Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Northern Petrochemical Co. v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board & Hotel & Restaurant Employees' Local No. 556Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. County of MowerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. County of MowerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Op. Atty. Gen. 125a-28 (Cr. Ref. 59a-25 161b-7), Minnesota Attorney General Reports2001
- Op. Atty. Gen. 125a-28 (Cr. Ref. 59a-25 161b-7), Minnesota Attorney General Reports2001