Legal Opinion

Board of County Commissioners v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1925No. 26,062PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

This controversy involves the question as to whether the district court has jurisdiction to regulate or fix the expenses incident to winding up the affairs of an insolvent bank, other than the compensation of the receiver.

The bank commissioner, F. H. Foster, took charge of the following banks on the dates indicated, and appointed B. V. Curry, receiver: The C. M. Condon State Bank of Oswego, March 15, 1922; The Farmers and Merchants State Bank of Chetopa, September 18,1922; The Labette State Bank of Labette, October 3, 1922. When Mr. Foster…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re ChetwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Rankin v. MillerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1913
  3. Valley Bank v. MalcolmArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State Ex Rel. Short v. NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Jeffries v. BacastowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hadlock v. State Bank of Millard CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  2. M. R. Harris Estate v. West Grove Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Wright v. Federal Reserve Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Mercantile Warehouse Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Bacastow v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API