Legal Opinion
Stankowski v. Farley
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 17, 2007No. 3:06cv1582PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum
MUNLEY, District Judge.
Before the court are plaintiffs objections (Doc. 8) to the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt (Doc. 5) in this case. The matter has been briefed and is ripe for disposition.
Background
This case arises out of plaintiffs guilty plea and incarceration in Pike County, Pennsylvania. 1 On August 15, 2006, plaintiff filed a pro se suit in this court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the attorney who represented him in that case (Defendant Farley), the Assistant District Attorney who prosecuted him (Defendant Tonkin), the judge who…
2Cases cited87 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Stankowski v. FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Allah v. PooleDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- Clark v. ConahanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Sital v. BurgioDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Aaron J. Bressi v. SCI-Rockview, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.