Legal Opinion
Sital v. Burgio
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided January 8, 2009No. 6:06-cr-06072PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Fans Sital, appearing pro se, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”), alleges that his constitutional rights were violated in a number of ways during his confinement at the Attica Correctional Facility.
Defendants have moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment on all but one of his claims. For the reasons that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rubin Sira v. R. Morton, C. Artuz, D. Selsky, and G. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Lloyd E. Boddie v. Officer B. Schnieder Officer D. Dewald Officer P. Robertson Sergeant K. Schmitt and Hearing Officer Mr. PicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Collins v. FergusonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011
- Coleman v. BealeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Crenshaw v. HartmanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Greene v. FurmanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Harriott v. AnnucciDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.