Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomas E. Sienkowski
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 20, 2004No. 03-2099PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
This appeal involves the government’s objection to the district court’s refusal to apply a United States Sentencing Guideline § 3B1.1 role enhancement for the defendant Thomas Sienkowski where the parties had agreed to the énhancement. Section 3Bl.l(b) provides for a three-level sentencing enhancement where a defendant is a manager or supervisor of criminal activity involving five or more participants. For the reasons stated herein, the sentence imposed by the district court is vacated and the case is remanded for resen-tencing consistent with this opinion. ■
I. Background
S…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Miles Davis SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. William J. Osborne, Thomas E. Hanna and Joseph Urbano, Jr., Also Known as Toby UrbanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Pena-HermosilloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Vincent SharpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Rondell FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Elizabeth R. RoachCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Pena-HermosilloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.