Lockshin v. Blue Cross
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBell, P. J.
Defendant-appellant, Blue Cross of Northeast Ohio (Blue Cross or defendant), appeals the trial court’s interpretation of certain benefits flowing from a hospitalization plan and the trial court’s subsequent order requiring Blue Cross to pay plaintiff-appellee, Eric S. Lockshin, $176 for expenses he incurred while employing a private nurse for his wife’s post-operative and post-pregnancy care. We reverse and remand.
Facts
Plaintiff’s hospitalization benefits are covered by a Blue Cross plan made available to him by his employer. On November 21, 1978, plaintiff’s wife, Carolyn, was admitted'to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rose v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
- Group Hospitalization, Inc. v. LevinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Stuhlbarg v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- Society of New York Hospital v. BursteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Goldfarb v. Associated Hospital ServiceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sarchett v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Thermographic Diagnostics, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Schroeder Ex Rel. Swanson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of WisconsinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- Sabatier v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Taulbee v. the Travelers CompaniesOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.