Legal Opinion

Lockshin v. Blue Cross

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1980No. 9714PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, P. J.

Defendant-appellant, Blue Cross of Northeast Ohio (Blue Cross or defendant), appeals the trial court’s interpretation of certain benefits flowing from a hospitalization plan and the trial court’s subsequent order requiring Blue Cross to pay plaintiff-appellee, Eric S. Lockshin, $176 for expenses he incurred while employing a private nurse for his wife’s post-operative and post-pregnancy care. We reverse and remand.

Facts

Plaintiff’s hospitalization benefits are covered by a Blue Cross plan made available to him by his employer. On November 21, 1978, plaintiff’s wife, Carolyn, was admitted'to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rose v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Group Hospitalization, Inc. v. LevinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Stuhlbarg v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Society of New York Hospital v. BursteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  5. Goldfarb v. Associated Hospital ServiceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sarchett v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Thermographic Diagnostics, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  3. Schroeder Ex Rel. Swanson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of WisconsinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  4. Sabatier v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Taulbee v. the Travelers CompaniesOhio Court of Appeals · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API