Stuhlbarg v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The first issue presented by the record is whether the medical certificates furnished by the plaintiff to the defendant company constituted “due proof” •of total and permanent disability as required by the insuran'ce contract. It is claimed by the defendant that ‘ ‘ due proof ’ ’ is made a condition precedent to the insured’s, right to receive benefits and that the submission of proof .of any disability, less than total and permanent disability which renders the insured unable •at any time to perform any work or engage in any business for compensation or profit, does not satisfy this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Equitable Life Ins. Co. v. GerwickOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. WheatleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Gibbons v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
- Federal Life Ins. Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dorothy Jane Simpson v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Everhart v. State Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
- Lockshin v. Blue CrossOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
- Continental Casualty Co. v. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Myers v. Travelers Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.