Legal Opinion

Thomson v. Superior Court of Mendicino

California Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1911No. S.F. No. 5821PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Certiorari directed to the Superior Court of Mendocino County. J. Q. White, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

A writ of certiorari was issued from this court directed to the superior court of Mendocino County and the judge thereof, requiring the certification here of the pro ceedings in the case of Ed. Gibson v. Henry T. Thomson et al., appealed to the said superior court from the justice’s court of Round Valley Township, county of Mendocino. In his petition Thomson prayed for a writ of certiorari and for mandate to compel the setting of the appealed case for trial in the superior court.

The action in the justice’s court was in claim and delivery. Trial was had before a jury and a verdict in favor of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Simmons v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Bell v. StaackeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Lynch v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Baldwin v. Santa Rosa Island Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Montgomery v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shriver v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Dalton v. AbercrombieIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  3. MacKelprang v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Shriver v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Wright v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API