Legal Opinion
In Re the Arbitration Between Prinze & Jonas
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 12, 1976PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gabrielli and Wachtler, JJ.
The petitioner is a well-known entertainer in the television industry. The respondent *572is a "personal manager” in the entertainment profession. On January 16,, 1974 they signed a contract whereby the petitioner agreed to employ the respondent as his agent for a period of three years. In exchange for his expert management services,' respondent would receive compensation at the rate of 15% of petitioner’s gross income. The contract is a standard form used and approved by the conference of personal managers in the entertainment industry. It contains an arbitration…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between Weinrott & CarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Nationwide General Insurance v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- In re the Arbitration between Aimcee Wholesale Corp. & Tomar Products, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Hirsch v. HirschNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- In re the Arbitration between National Equipment Rental Ltd. & American Pecco Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- 166 Mamaroneck Ave. Corp. v. 151 East Post Road Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Smith Barney Shearson Inc. v. SacharowNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Sablosky v. Edward S. Gordon Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Kennelly v. Mobius Realty Holdings LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Shields v. GrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.