Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Aimcee Wholesale Corp. & Tomar Products, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 18, 1968PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKeating, J.
In February of 1964, appellant, Aimcee Wholesale Corporation, bought some $100,000 in merchandise from respondent, Tomar Products, Inc. The contract, a form purchase order, contained a broad arbitration clause to the effect that ‘ ‘ Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this *624contract or the breach thereof ” would be submitted to arbitration.
In August of 1965, Aimcee sought arbitration of a claim for $26,870.61 based upon allegations that the merchandise shipped was defective and that certain advertising allowances had not been paid. At about that time, Aimcee had been sued by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- In the Matter or Lowell S. Fallick, Bankrupt-Appellant v. Harry KehrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Wilko v. SwanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Manhattan Storage & Warehouse Co. v. Movers & Warehousemen's Ass'n of Greater New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Sprinzen & NombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Dale S. COENEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. W. PRESSPRICH & CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and Stirling Homex Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Ass'n v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Walter J. Cobb, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Jerry LewisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Keating v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.