Legal Opinion

Patel v. Patel (In re Patel)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico

Decided October 14, 2016No. 7-10-12627 JA; Adversary No. 10-1200 JPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROBERT H. JACOBVITZ, United States Bankruptcy Judge

Before the Court is the motion to tax costs filed by Plaintiffs. See Docket No. 146 (the “Motion”). Plaintiffs obtained a nondischargeable judgment against Defen-dants in the amount of $35,946 on two claims for embezzlement under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4). Plaintiffs now seek reimbursement of $9,750.25 in litigation costs, includ-ing fees for copying, transcription services, and witness travel. After carefully review-ing the Motion, the cost bill and its sup-porting documentation, and the relevant law, the Court concludes…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. In Re Williams Securities Litigation-WCG SubclassCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  4. Barber v. T.D. Williamson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  5. Cohlmia, Jr. v. St. John Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API