Legal Opinion
Meisel Tire Co. v. Mar-Bel Trading Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided May 29, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.
Plaintiff sues to recover the value of certain chattels alleged to have been converted by defendant.
On October 31, 1934, one Perry purchased from plaintiff two Goodrich tires, tubes and one heater for an automobile. The purchase was “ on time.” He executed a conditional sales contract by which instrument title to the mentioned articles is reserved in plaintiff until payment in full. Perry had purchased an automobile under a conditional sales contract of which ifce defendant was *665originally the owner by assignment. The articles purchased from the plaintiff were put upon this automobile. There…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bousquet v. Mack Motor Truck Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Hallman v. Dothan Foundry & MacHine Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1919
- K. C. Tire Co. v. Way Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- American Typefounders Co. v. ConnerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
- John W. Snyder, Inc. v. AkerNew York Supreme Court · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Intra-Mar Shipping (Cuba) S. A. v. John S. Emery & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- American Middle East Corp. v. BaroukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961